MY easy answer is to simply comply with the requirements of a utility patent. It demands “uniqueness” - and there’s a chance your new idea will be deemed “obvious”. Both qualities are ultimately determined by authorities of the USPTO. Even then, rejections and issuances might be challenged. Either way, it’s a battle best avoided. So, it’s better to do a thorough search to prove worthiness of your idea - before wasting time, effort and money. Always consider the keywords: “uniqueness” and “obvious”.
Similarly, the combination of items, or the supposed improvements of such items must likewise be “unique”… and avoid the “obvious”. Simply altering things - like changing materials or adding wheels and brackets - may not qualify your improvement as being “unique”. The rejections for being “obvious” may imply that others would have considered, thought of or adapted such variations all by themselves – without your inventive foresight. Sorry, no patent for you!
An example of a successfully patented “combination” or “improvement” is presented in Robert Merrick’s book - Stand Alone, Inventor. He had the idea of attaching a transparent calendar to a watch crystal. How simple is that?
Early advisors discouraged Merrick’s pursuit of a patent. Calendars were already in use. So were watches. But, Merrick filed a “combination patent”. His attorney agreed Merrick; “had fashioned a transparent pressure-sensitive label with a monthly calendar printed on it, which is removably attachable to the crystal of a watch.” The USPTO also agreed, and awarded a Utility Patent for his “Watch With Transparent Calendar.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4fd9/d4fd9916e85fd2d77a514aa706e92d0131aefe87" alt=""
You stick or peel the calendar film
So there you go. It can be done. You can seek a patent covering the combination of known ideas or patented products. But, your idea must be “unique” - and avoid the “obvious”. Good Luck!
No comments:
Post a Comment